Results 1 – 12 of 18 by Arnold M. Ludwig;Arthur J. Deikman;Milton H. Erickson;Gerald Vogel;M. Bertini;David Foulkes;Frederik van Eeden;Kilton Stewart. Arthur J. Deikman is the author of The Observing Self ( avg rating, 43 ratings, 2 reviews, published ), The Wrong Way Home ( avg rating, 29 r. Meditation” by psychiatrist Arthur Deikman. Meditation was then largely considered a strange, possibly psychotic-making or psychotic-manifesting activity .
|Published (Last):||24 April 2008|
|PDF File Size:||20.90 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.77 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
A profound and historic collection of papers by a pioneer of transpersonal psychology.
Arthur J. Deikman
Fearless Books is pleased to announce drikman publication of a landmark collection of papers and articles authored by the late Arthur Deikman M. A clinical professor of psychiatry at the University of San Francisco for two decades and a courageously independent researcher, Dr. Deikman led the way in original investigations into such topics as: What is the difference between psychosis and mystical states of consciousness?
What do the great artgur traditions have to tell us about the farthest reaches of the human mind? How can we recognize cult behavior, whether it occurs in isolated groups or the culture at large? What are the most sensible and effective approaches to meditation?
Arthur J. Deikman (Author of The Observing Self)
These questions and many more are answered in this profound and exciting anthology by a founding researcher in the field now known as transpersonal psychology.
This is the rare book that provides both an education and a deimkan experience for readers interested in the history of open-mindedness. He developed a humane form of psychotherapy for patients with psychosis, and was one of the earliest investigators to discriminate between pathological and genuinely advanced mystical states of consciousness.
Deikman served as a clinical professor of psychiatry at the University of San Francisco. Arthur was born with the gift of clarity and he had an extraordinary instinct for the good. What a friend he was! Dfikman a boon to the wide world!
When I finished my doctoral training inthe world was a changing and very interesting place. My research focus through graduate school had been on hypnosis, sleep, and artgur, which was “far out” for the psychology and psychiatry establishments of the time.
In the general culture, psychedelic drugs were about to have major effects, especially on young people. Eastern religions and associated Mystical practices were becoming available, promising a spirituality based on actual, direct experience rather than a religion based on faith. I had been an experimental subject in some psychiatric psychedelic drug experiments while in graduate school, and had also read widely in what were then and still are unusual, virtually unknown sources for orthodox psychology and psychiatry.
It was already clear to me that our “official” scientific knowledge of the human mind, while immensely valuable in some ways, was rather narrow and biased. Ceikman continued my research on hypnosis and dreams for a decade after receiving my doctorate, but as I watched the spread of psychedelic drug usage and deiman rapid growth of various forms of mysticism and meditation in our culture, I realized that I needed to take a much wider look at the unusual things that could happen to human consciousness.
This resulted in my Altered States of Consciousness anthology, published in Two of the most important chapters in the book were by Arthur Deikman. Indeed, discovering Deikman’s ground-breaking work was a major delight in my search for scientific literature on arrhur states, and his work continued to inspire deeikman for the next half century.
After an initial chapter dealing with the definition of altered states, the second chapter in my anthology was Deikman’s “Deautomatization and the mystic experience,” which he had published in the mainstream Journal of Psychiatry in volume 29, Arthur showed that what we think of as the “normal” functionings of the mind are largely habits of functioning, shaped by culture in an automatized and conditioned manner.
In various situations we automatically and selectively perceive what we are supposed to perceive — whatever our culture has defined as “normal” — and we feel and act accordingly. This generally works out well if our culture has fully understood what’s important about various situations and developed adequate responses, but leads to great problems as reality changes, especially when the change is subtle.
This automization process is almost never conscious, and can be so powerful that it amounts to blockages that make us not perceive certain aspects of what could be richer and more accurate experiences.
Deikman’s brilliant insight was that certain practices like meditation that reduce, even temporarily, the power of such automatization could allow us to have new perceptions and epiphanies.
Whether such deautomization is then guided in a creative direction of useful insights, or toward illusion or pathology, is a separate question. I found Deikman’s concept of deautomization to be of almost universal usefulness in understanding a wide variety of processes of the human mind Arthur Deikman’s interests were very wide-ranging.
His interest in the nature of consciousness, for example, not only included the mystic and altered states end deikmsn the spectrum, but the practical aspects of psychotherapy. One of his most interesting projects, reported on in several articles in this collection, is about his attempts to reform the treatment regime of a major psychiatric hospital to undertake practical psychological work with patients — which meant respecting them as people, rather than just giving them drugs and locking them away This was going against the establishment, which was rather overly charmed with the arhtur of drug treatment or psychiatric disorders.
Indeed, some people would say the psychiatric establishment is still quite overly arthir with medication. One of the frustrations deikmah Deikman’s career was that it took many years arghur get his reports about this daring work published in orthodox journals. He was also quite interested in what modern science could contribute to understanding consciousness. I remember a few years ago when he devoted a year to deeply reading in the literature of modern seikman, to see how quantum approaches and the new physics could cast some light on the workings of consciousness.
We had a number of discussions about this, but despite some of my early initial training being in the physical sciences, he was way ahead of me artuur his understanding. Not that he was a narrow-minded physical reductionist who expected that the physical sciences would eventually explain away consciousness as nothing but electrochemical arhhur in the brain. He grasped that there is a physical brain involved but not totally identical with consciousness, and understanding its workings is part of a full understanding of the nature of the human mind.
There are other dimensions of Deikman’s understanding that you will encounter in the articles in this book, and I will let them speak for themselves. This gentle man, my friend, always impressed and stimulated me by the depth of his curiosity, comprehension, and clarity, and I think you will be too.
Now, we will relate some examples of trust building and power sharing that, for political reasons, dei,man felt unable to publish previously because they seemed too radical. As described in artuhr previous articles, patient-personnel meetings of the entire ward were characterized increasingly by active patient initiatives to the point that patients began to run some of the meetings.
Occasionally, they chose to reverse patient and staff roles and a kind of ironic humor emerged when patients mimicked staff with consequent laughter all around; the patients came to sober realizations as they came to appreciate the difficult challenges of being staff.
They concluded that they preferred their easier roles as patients. Deikamn we did not report in our previous articles were the more extreme instances of this growing dynamic.
In October, about arthue weeks into the full operation of the ward, the patients decided to hold a Halloween party for patients and staff, but did not reveal the particulars until the party was underway.
It turned out that what the patients had planned was a Salem witch trial during which each staff member was accused of a therapeutic crime and sentenced to have a hand or foot immersed in ice water for a length of time appropriate to the gravity of their misdeed. Every staff member was accused, dejkman, and sentenced for their crimes.
Dr. Arthur Deikman
For example, with suitable irony, Deikman was accused and convicted of prescribing too many drugs. Next came a more radical request: There was remarkably little hesitation by staff or patients, although patients were nervous about the implicit responsibility, and staff knew it would have been impossible for them to be heard crying out to other hospital personnel for help; some staff were concerned they might become the laughing stock if the patients did not unlock the door and release us.
After about 20 minutes of being crowded together in the isolation room, the patients let the staff out for good behavior. The isolation room, literally a padded cell, was never used, before or after Halloween, for involuntary patient isolation; any patient who wished to use it for the sake of peace and quiet was allowed to, but none ever did.
We turn now to some specific challenges to our program, starting with the example of a woman who swallowed sharp objects. We found that a psychiatric resident had been covertly administering drugs to her without that stopping her behavior.
After learning of the covert medicating, stopping that, and not knowing how to stop her from harming herself, the solution came from patients who, knowing of our concern, decided to intervene. They gathered at her bedside one evening and directly expressed their wish to help her, asking how they could do so. Aside from her potentially suicidal behavior and that of many others, during the eleven months of the ward program, there were no suicides or suicide attempts.
Staff attitudes and cohesion integral to the ward milieu also had a strong immediate influence on even newly admitted patients’ self-destructive behavior.
For example, Whitaker did an intake interview one morning with a severely anorexic woman with whom forced feeding would have been considered.
The ward staff sat on both sides of the room and the patient and Whitaker faced one another in the middle. Whitaker told the patient that he understood she was not eating and then said that he appreciated that because the hospital had severe budgetary problems and that she could help reduce food deiiman.
Furthermore, he added, the hospital food was of poor quality anyway so she would not be missing anything. She then looked on each side of the room at staff and asked “Is this man crazy? The ward lunch hour followed the interview; subsequently, staff informed Whitaker that she had not only eaten the deilman course but also three desserts.
She also continued to eat during her ward stay, was discharged, and about two years later greeted Whitaker on the street, appearing slim but not anorexic, and thanked him