ABSTRACT. Euthanasia is a debate among lawyers, medical experts and theologians in which euthanasia is an act of facilitating the death of a person. Euthanasia or assisted suicide—and sometimes both—have been legalized in a small number of countries and states. In all jurisdictions, laws and safeguards. Contoh Kasus Euthanasia Pasif yang terjadi pada bayi Nisza Ismail by adnin_ii.
|Published (Last):||25 August 2014|
|PDF File Size:||4.45 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.94 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The problem of euthanasia emerges again and again in today’s Europe. The Dutch type of regulation of euthanasia could be introduced into the Hungarian legal system.
Today, in Hungary, the ethical guidelines of the chamber of medicine, the criminal law and the administrative health law also forbid active euthanasia. In Hungary, the criminal code reform of missed to liberalise the regulation of euthanasia. Such liberalisation awaits bottom-up support from the part of the society. In Hungary, a passive form of euthanasia is legal, i.
The patient is not allowed to refuse medical treatment, if she is pregnant and foreseeably capable to give birth to her child. Euthanasia means to cause humane death. Some current euthanasia techniques may become unacceptable over time and be replaced by new techniques as more data are gathered and evaluated. The recommendations in the panel report were intended to serve as guidelines, and they require the use of professional judgement for specific situations.
Ultimately, it is the responsibility of those persons carrying out euthanasia to assure that it is done in the most humane manner possible. The principles of self-determination and individual well-being support the use of voluntary euthanasia by those who do not have moral or professional objections to it.
Opponents of this posture cite the ethical wrongness of the eutnanasia itself and the folly of any public or legal policy permitting euthanasia. Positive consequences of making euthanasia legally permissible respect the autonomy of competent patients desiring it, expand the population of patients who can eutuanasia the option, and release the dying patient from otherwise prolonged pasic and agony.
Potentially bad consequences of permitting euthanasia include the undermining of the “moral center” of medicine by allowing physicians to kill, the weakening of society’s commitment to provide optimal care for dying patients, and, of greatest concern, the “slippery slope” argument. The evaluation of the arguments leads to support for euthanasiawith its performance not incompatible with a physician’s professional commitment.
Smoker that is an expanded version of a work by Britain’s Voluntary Euthanasia Society. Rachels maintains that it is illogical to distinguish between active and passive euthanasia. In Voluntary Euthanasia17 contributors argue the pros and cons of the issue. The Voluntary Euhtanasia Society proposes that mentally competent persons be allowed by law to request euthanasiaeither when taken ill or by advance directive.
Brewin says he is almost but not quite convinced by the arguments for legalized voluntary euthanasia. He is concerned about the “slippery slope,” the uncertainties of prognosis and quality of life judgments, the pressures to which the terminally ill or aged might be subjected, and the potentially negative impact of euthanasia on the physician patient relationship.
The growing interest in the subject of active euthanasia in connection with the debate regarding legalization of such practices in Denmark necessitates taking a definite standpoint. The difference in concept between active and passive euthanasia is stressed, and the Dutch guidelines are reviewed. The article discusses euthanaisa far the patient’s autonomy should go, as it regards the consideration of self-determination as being too narrow a criterion in itself.
The discussion on the quality of life is included, and the consequences of the process of euthanadia as a sociological concept are considered–the risk of a patient feeling guilty for being alive and therefore feeling compelled to request active euthanasia.
The changed function of the physician is underlined, and it is discussed whether active euthansia will cause a breach of confidence between the physician and his patient.
Legalizing euthanasia or assisted suicide: the illusion of safeguards and controls
In connection with the debate the following tendencies in society are emphasized: Despite advances in the care of infants, there remain many newborns whose medical conditions are incompatible with sustained life. At times, healthcare providers and parents may agree that prolonging life is not an appropriate goal of care, and they may redirect treatment to alleviate suffering.
While pediatric palliative treatment protocols are gaining greater acceptance, there remain some children whose suffering is unrelenting despite maximal efforts. Due to the realization that some infants suffer unbearably ie, the burdens of suffering outweigh the benefits of lifethe Dutch have developed a protocol for euthanizing these newborns. In this review, I examine the ethical aspects of 6 forms of end of life care, explain the ethical arguments in support of euthanasiareview the history and verbiage of the United States regulations governing limiting and withdrawing life-prolonging interventions in infants, describe the 3 categories of neonates for whom the Dutch provide euthanasisreview the published analyses of the Dutch protocol, and finally present some practical considerations should some form of euthanasia ever be deemed appropriate.
Directory of Open Access Journals Sweden. Technological progress in medicine regarding the application of life-sustaining treatment in the critical paasif and the cultural changes that have taken place in contemporary society with respect to the patients’ right to decide over the end of their lives, demand the existence of a definition of euthanasia that will acknowledge this new scenario. The concept of euthaanasia would be very specifically limited by the exclusion of so-called passive forms of euthanasia and of omission as a possible procedure to cause death and the need for the explicit request of the patient involved.
Likewise, the definition of euthanasia should include a specific. Euthanasia and euthxnasia law. Summary- Euthanasia and criminal law Euthanasia is often regarded as a controversial topic that is being discussed all around the world.
The legislative rules differ among the countries to various extent. The scope of this work is to offer a summary of legal regulations in euthanasiaparticulary in the area of criminal law and a several examples of these regulations in Europe, USA and Australia. In the first chapter, the term of euthanasia is defined which is necessary for the purpose In this article we discuss the moral and legal aspects of causing the death of a terminal patient in the hope of extending their life in the future.
We call this theoretical procedure cryothanasia. We argue that administering cryothanasia is ethically different from administering euthanasia. Consequently, objections to euthanasia should not apply to cryothanasia, and cryothanasia could also be considered a legal option where euthanasia is illegal.
Several sections of the Criminal Code of Canada which are relevant to the issue of euthanasia are discussed. In addition, the value placed on the sanctity of life by the law, the failure to recognize motive in cases of euthanasiaand disparate legal and medical definitions of death are also considered.
Our goal in this article is to explicate pasic way, and the extent to which, euthanasia can be voluntary from both the perspective of the patient and duthanasia perspective of the health care providers involved in the patient’s care. More significantly, we aim to challenge the way in which those engaged oasif ongoing philosophical debates regarding the morality of euthanasia draw distinctions between voluntary, involuntary, and nonvoluntary euthanasia on the grounds that drawing the distinctions in the traditional manner 1 fails to reflect what is important from the patient’s perspective and 2 fails to reflect the significance of health care providers’ interests, including their autonomy and integrity.
Focuses on the moral arguments for and against the controversial topic of voluntary active euthanasia. Discusses the question of legalization and decriminalization of the practice. Provides a student worksheet with questions to euthhanasia discussion on the issue. Discourses on death and dying are multiple, heterogeneous and not always coincide and never fully complement.
Each aims to define, meet and own death phenomenon. Each discipline created with its own resources. One of the first problems that euthanasia since its inception is the lot of concepts, types and subtitles in the world. The origin of this situation is that euthanasia only etymologically means “good death”, which is sufficiently ambiguous and neutral that generates all kinds of etuhanasia Debate over euthanasia is not a recent phenomenon.
Over the euthanasiq, public opinion, decisions of courts, and legal and medical approaches to the issue of euthanasia has been conflicting. The connection between murder and euthanasia has been attempted in a few debates.
Although it is widely accepted that murder is a crime, a clearly defined stand has not been taken on euthanasia. This article considers euthanasia from the medical, legal, and global perspectives and discusses the crime of murder in relation to euthanasiataking into consideration the issue of consent in the law of crime.
euthanasia: Topics by
This article concludes that in the midst of this debate on euthanasia and murder, the important thing is that different countries need to find their own solution to the issue of euthanasia rather than trying to import solutions from other countries. The passive form of euthanasia is legalized almost in every civilized country.
Its active form is not a generally accepted legal institution. In Australia, the Act on the Rights of the Terminally Ill of legalized the institution of assisted suicide, which is not identical to active euthanasia.
The difference lies in the fact that legalized active euthanasia means that the author of a euthamasia is not punishable under certain circumstanceswhilst assisted suicide is not about murder, rather about suicide.
In the first case, the patient is killed on his or her request by someone else. In the second case, the patient himself or herself executes the act of self-killing by the assistance of a healthcare worker. In Australia, the institution of assisted suicide was repealed in Assisted suicide is legal in four USA member states: In Uruguay, the active form of euthanasia has been legal since Kinds of euthanasia can be distinguished in a number of im- portant ways.
There is, first, the distinction between active and passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia is the intentional killing of a person for their sake. Right to life -as the prohibition of intentionally and arbitrarily taking life, even with authorization of the concerned one- is an internationally recognized right.
In many countries, debate regarding euthanasia is more centered in its convenience, social acceptability and how it is regulated, than in its substantial legitimacy. Some euthanadia that euthanasia should be included as part of clinical practice of health professionals, grounded on individual’s autonomy claims-everyone having the liberty to choose how to live and how to die. Against this, others sustain that life has a higher value than autonomy, exercising autonomy without respecting the right to life would become a serious moral and social problem.
Likewise, euthanasia supporters some-times claim a ‘right to live with dignity’, which must be understood as a personal obligation, referred more to the ethical than to the strictly legal sphere. In countries where it is already legalized, euthanasia practice has extended to cases where it is not the patient who requests this but the family euthanasoa some healthcare professional, or even the legal system-when they think that the patient is living in a condition which is not worthy to live.
Generalization of euthanasia possibly will end eeuthanasia affecting those who need more care, such as elder, chronically ill or dying people, damaging severely personal basic rights. Nature, purpose and tradition of medicine rule out the practice of euthznasiawhich ought not be considered a medical act or legitimately compulsory for physicians.
Today’s medicine counts with effective treatments for pain and suffering, such as palliative care, including sedative therapy, which best preserves persons dignity and psaif safe the ethos of the euthanasa profession. In Indonesia, euthanasia can not be done and it is classified as an illegal act. Both in the positive law and the ethics code regulate that performing an euthanasia is euthanaasia allowed.
Regarded to the perspective of Islamic law, also regulated that an active euthanasia is an act that is forbidden and punishable by God with a punishment of hell for those who did. The results of a follow-up study of euthanasia by the Dutch government, five years after the first study, were published on November euthahasia, This article provides a detailed review of the two reports comparing and contrasting the statistics cited therein.
The author notes that the “rules of careful conduct” proposed by the courts and by the Royal Dutch Society of Medicine were pasig disregarded. Special topics included for the first time in the second study were the notification and non-prosecution procedure, euthanasia of newborns and infants, and assisted suicide in psychiatric practice. The authors of the follow-up report state that it would be desirable to reduce the number euthannasia “terminations of life without patients’ request,” but this must be the common responsibility of the doctor and the patient.
They suggest that the person who does not wish to eeuthanasia his life terminated should declare this clearly, in advance, verbally and in writing, preferably in the form of a living will. Involuntary euthanasia was rampant in and equally rampant in The author concludes that Dutch doctors who practice euthanasia are not on the slippery slope.
From the very beginning, they have been at the bottom. Full Text Available The right paslf live is a right guaranteed by the constitution as well as international legal acts in force in a country, and is based on the moral of a society. But does the right to live imply a parallel individual right to die?